I’m using a large enough font, 18pt Tahoma (open image in new tab to view full size), that the negative letter-space is OK. Also think about the associations people make with certain fonts. Love ‘em or hate ‘em, memes are inextricably entwined with Impact, so that’s a font to avoid unless you’re going for that meme-ish feel. Similarly, if a font has thick letters with soft, rounded corners but that style doesn’t extend to its numbers or punctuation, the font feels inconsistent and even incomplete. Learn how to recognize different font styles and find out more about their pros and cons, making each option perfect for a specific scenario.
- It’s a solid solution for designs without a lot of other competing visuals, such as the example above from Robert Leitl.
- What if it’s shown on an older, lower resolution monitor?
- All this means is that the font’s weight—the placement of its thicker lines—is distributed in a way that looks like it wouldn’t go toppling over if it was a tangible object.
- It helps create a visual focus for the highly designed products in the background.
- In a nutshell, experimental typefaces are often unusual.
Word Wrap is an option, but the row height will not be adjusted to auto-fit the contents of each cell. If you are reading straight text (no numbers) at 11px, then I think Segoe is easier to read. serif webresources But, whoever decided Segoe UI is an all around easier to read font than arial… I’ve asked several people and everyone thinks Arial is more readable for data at 12px (9pt) (including myself).
Share This Post
In general, at small point sizes (remembering point sizes refer to height), I would recommend Verdana because it has a very high x-height which provides wide open counters. That will make it wider than some other fonts, which isn’t what you’re looking for (based on your examples). There are assumptions in this question, the biggest one being that the “correct solution” to this UX issue is small text. Small text becomes unreadable, an issue aggravated by tablets and other mobile devices. What if it’s shown on an older, lower resolution monitor?
The results as I recall them were that Segoe UI and Tahoma were the best with respect to space utilization and readability for UI purposes at 10pt and 9pt sizes. In the short term we settled on Tahoma since Segoe UI isn’t freely available for operating systems below Windows Vista. See this list for a lineup of available Windows fonts as well as information about the best of use https://deveducation.com/ of each. In Arthean’s design for Planet Diamonds, we see a perfect example of a font that’s an ideal fit for its brand. Planet Diamonds creates lab-grown diamonds for its jewelry line, giving eco-focused consumers another option in the marketplace. Didot is an excellent font that uses dramatic variations between thick and thin strokes while still managing to maintain balance.
How do you choose a font for extremely limited space, i.e. will fit the most READABLE text in the smallest space?
Quicksand, a sans-serif font from Google, does well on mobile devices. It was built on a foundation of geometric shapes to give the impression of friendliness. Along with Georgia, Helvetica is considered to be one of the most easy to read fonts according to The Next Web.
